© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
9199653
demo site
(Get the code!)
A few comments and questions:
1. Should we include the hv_sock module as built-in or keep it as a module?
2. It's better to try to reserve in upstream the address family number (AF_HYPERV) to avoid conflicts with future rebases and problems with userspace.
3. It seems that net/core/sock.c also needs to be updated with AF_HYPERV. I can include those changes on the patch that I will submit to our mailing list. But I'd like to have that patch reviewed but Microsoft.