Comment 91 for bug 150690

Sebastien,

This bug is marked as affecting nearly 5 dozen people. Some (including me) consider it a regression, as the functionality used to work.

It has 12 other bugs (affecting who knows how many people) all marked as duplicates. It was reported in 2007, possibly one or more of the 12 duplicates is even older than that. Who knows.

While I guess it's certainly your prerogative to decide to decline to fix this, it really would be nice to see the functionality, or similar, added back into the software.

Thanks in advance, and here's hoping this matter can be resolved within the next few years - before its 10th birthday in 2017.