Once the fix in libvirt landed we still have to change virt-manager as the current storage request exactly matches the definition of the "then use falloc" case.
I've requested that on the upstream bug [1], we will have to see how that turns out.
Until we have a change to land in virt-manager (unless we find a different important use case triggering this) it makes no sense to push these fixes for libvirt right now :-/
Once the fix in libvirt landed we still have to change virt-manager as the current storage request exactly matches the definition of the "then use falloc" case.
I've requested that on the upstream bug [1], we will have to see how that turns out.
Until we have a change to land in virt-manager (unless we find a different important use case triggering this) it makes no sense to push these fixes for libvirt right now :-/
[1]: https:/ /bugzilla. redhat. com/show_ bug.cgi? id=1759454