is no upside down question marks are presented in the Math formulas.
4) What happens is the upside down question marks are present erroneously due to "newline" command. If "newline" is preceded or followed by some characters (as +, -, =, which are often needed), some error marks "¿" are obtained, and perhaps only a single line if displayed (it depends on the character and its relative position to "newline"). Examples :
a+b_ij = newline = c+d # single line; error mark
a+b_ij newline = c+d # two lines; missing "="; error mark
a+b_ij newline + c+d # correct behaviour !! The "+" sign does fine after newline...
a+b_ij + newline c+d # ... but not before: single line, error mark here
a+b_ij = newline c+d # single line, error mark. The "=" sign does bad whether after or before newline
Created attachment 52281 issue.odt
math_newline_
Downstream bug may be found at: /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ libreoffice/ +bug/281053
https:/
1) lsb_release -rd
Description: Ubuntu 11.10
Release: 11.10
2) apt-cache policy libreoffice-writer us.archive. ubuntu. com/ubuntu/ oneiric/main i386 Packages dpkg/status
libreoffice-writer:
Installed: 1:3.4.3-3ubuntu2
Candidate: 1:3.4.3-3ubuntu2
Version table:
*** 1:3.4.3-3ubuntu2 0
500 http://
100 /var/lib/
apt-cache policy libreoffice-math us.archive. ubuntu. com/ubuntu/ oneiric/main i386 Packages dpkg/status
libreoffice-math:
Installed: 1:3.4.3-3ubuntu2
Candidate: 1:3.4.3-3ubuntu2
Version table:
*** 1:3.4.3-3ubuntu2 0
500 http://
100 /var/lib/
3) What is expected to happen in LibreOffice Writer via the Terminal:
cd ~/Desktop && wget https:/ /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ libreoffice/ +bug/281053/ +attachment/ 2417117/ +files/ math_newline_ issue.tar. gz && file-roller -h math_newline_ issue.tar. gz && cd math_newline_issue && lowriter -nologo math_newline_ issue.odt
is no upside down question marks are presented in the Math formulas.
4) What happens is the upside down question marks are present erroneously due to "newline" command. If "newline" is preceded or followed by some characters (as +, -, =, which are often needed), some error marks "¿" are obtained, and perhaps only a single line if displayed (it depends on the character and its relative position to "newline"). Examples :
a+b_ij = newline = c+d # single line; error mark
a+b_ij newline = c+d # two lines; missing "="; error mark
a+b_ij newline + c+d # correct behaviour !! The "+" sign does fine after newline...
a+b_ij + newline c+d # ... but not before: single line, error mark here
a+b_ij = newline c+d # single line, error mark. The "=" sign does bad whether after or before newline