On 03/14/2015 02:14 PM, Richard Jones wrote:
> OK ignore the previous comment, apparently gcc-go should be enough. But
> as you say it cannot compile the golang bindings on aarch64. Is there
> some guidance about how cgo bindings need to be changed for 1.4?
no, all I found was the documentation for the cgo command, and then experimented.
apparently the directives are not recognized when placed in /* ... */ style
comments, you have to use the // style.
On 03/14/2015 02:14 PM, Richard Jones wrote:
> OK ignore the previous comment, apparently gcc-go should be enough. But
> as you say it cannot compile the golang bindings on aarch64. Is there
> some guidance about how cgo bindings need to be changed for 1.4?
no, all I found was the documentation for the cgo command, and then experimented.
apparently the directives are not recognized when placed in /* ... */ style
comments, you have to use the // style.