>>>>> "Till" == Till Kamppeter <email address hidden> writes:
Till> Build the package on the system which you have at hand (amd64,
Till> i386, ...), directing the build output into a file. Search
Till> through the output to see whther there are any compiler
Till> warnings and fix them all. With that done the package should
Till> build on ppc64el.
No, that won't work.
The issue is the ppc64el compiler is behaving differently than the amd64
compiler.
The warning would be an error on any platform.
It's not an warning on amd64, nor is it a warning for ppc64el in debian.
I've spent the time I have here. On the Debian side I'd definitely take
a patch that added extra extranious initializations to pacify the
compiler.
I recommend that approach to avoid a divergence between ubuntu and
debian.
>>>>> "Till" == Till Kamppeter <email address hidden> writes:
Till> Build the package on the system which you have at hand (amd64,
Till> i386, ...), directing the build output into a file. Search
Till> through the output to see whther there are any compiler
Till> warnings and fix them all. With that done the package should
Till> build on ppc64el.
No, that won't work.
The issue is the ppc64el compiler is behaving differently than the amd64
compiler.
The warning would be an error on any platform.
It's not an warning on amd64, nor is it a warning for ppc64el in debian.
I've spent the time I have here. On the Debian side I'd definitely take
a patch that added extra extranious initializations to pacify the
compiler.
I recommend that approach to avoid a divergence between ubuntu and
debian.