I believe this isn't a duplicate of the nvidia-common bug, but a separate issue. From the referenced bug:
It looks like /usr/share/jockey/handlers/fglrx.py in package jockey-common expects the package fgrlx-updates to create a module named 'fglrx-updates', but the module generated by building that package is actually named 'fglrx'. See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer-updates/+bug/825339
Can someone who knows this code comment on this issue? How can we get the jockey-common and fglrx-updates maintainers to agree on an interface?
I believe this isn't a duplicate of the nvidia-common bug, but a separate issue. From the referenced bug:
It looks like /usr/share/ jockey/ handlers/ fglrx.py in package jockey-common expects the package fgrlx-updates to create a module named 'fglrx-updates', but the module generated by building that package is actually named 'fglrx'. See https:/ /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ fglrx-installer -updates/ +bug/825339
Can someone who knows this code comment on this issue? How can we get the jockey-common and fglrx-updates maintainers to agree on an interface?