Comment 5 for bug 491463
Revision history for this message
| Scott James Remnant (Canonical) (canonical-scott) wrote Re: [Bug 491463] Re: misc: support upstart within an initramfs | #5 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
513534c
demo site
(Get the code!)
On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 08:21 +0000, ceg wrote:
> If we would have a defined state at the and of the initramfs boot, say
> "rootfs fully set up" implying all its dependencies would we still need
> state passing? Or could the main upstart take it from there.
>
I think we should do it properly and pass all state, there may be
services running from the initramfs that match services from the real
system - udev, plymouth, bootchart, etc. are all examples *today* where
we use a hack to pass the pid into Upstart
Scott
--
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?