I don't believe this merits the "High" importance under the guidelines of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Bug%20importances... this doesn't have a severe impact on users, make a default Ubuntu installation generally unusable, etc.
One could argue this is a Low importance but (ie, there is an easy workaround, just use both settings).
However, these two keys aren't equivalent . clock-format is a 12h/24h toggle. time-format has those two options, and two others: (1) follow the locale default, and (2) use a custom strftime-style format string. So dropping the time-format key would regress us on those two settings, and locale-default is in fact the default setting.
I guess we could replace the 12h/24h options in clock-format with an entry 'use-clock-format', but I'm not sure that would actually help if the goal is to simplify the dconf settings :)
I don't believe this merits the "High" importance under the guidelines of https:/ /wiki.ubuntu. com/Bugs/ Bug%20importanc es... this doesn't have a severe impact on users, make a default Ubuntu installation generally unusable, etc.
One could argue this is a Low importance but (ie, there is an easy workaround, just use both settings).
However, these two keys aren't equivalent . clock-format is a 12h/24h toggle. time-format has those two options, and two others: (1) follow the locale default, and (2) use a custom strftime-style format string. So dropping the time-format key would regress us on those two settings, and locale-default is in fact the default setting.
I guess we could replace the 12h/24h options in clock-format with an entry 'use-clock-format', but I'm not sure that would actually help if the goal is to simplify the dconf settings :)