On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov <email address hidden>
wrote:
> I thought we have systemd hotplugging as well, can we not generate
>
I'm not sure what this means
> depedencies that <email address hidden> Wants= and After=
> <email address hidden>? and prevent all of these locks?
>
Wants= and AFter= are systemd *unit* dependencies, the locks and order
here
are internal states for ifupdown itself.
Systemd isn't in the picture other than it triggers calls, either ifup@.service
calling ifup on a specific interface (physical ones due do hotplug)
Or the networking.service, which invokes ifup -a (for all non-physical
interfaces defined).
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov <email address hidden>
wrote:
> I thought we have systemd hotplugging as well, can we not generate
>
I'm not sure what this means
> depedencies that <email address hidden> Wants= and After=
> <email address hidden>? and prevent all of these locks?
>
Wants= and AFter= are systemd *unit* dependencies, the locks and order
here
are internal states for ifupdown itself.
Systemd isn't in the picture other than it triggers calls, either ifup@.service
calling ifup on a specific interface (physical ones due do hotplug)
Or the networking.service, which invokes ifup -a (for all non-physical
interfaces defined).
> /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 1636708 /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ ifupdown/ +bug/ +subscriptions
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https:/
>
> Title:
> ifup -a does not start dependants last, causes deadlocks with
> vlans/bonding
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https:/
> 1636708/
>