Gerhard Radatz [2009-06-20 16:24 -0000]:
> After installing this latest patch, my WiFi STOPPED working, saying something like
> "iwlagn: rfkill switch must be turned off" in dmesg (alltough the rfkill switch definitely is ON)
You mean the switch is off, and wifi should be on? What happens if you
switch it the other way round?
> The currently installed version is 0.5.12~rc1+git20090403-0ubuntu1, the
> updated version would be 0.5.12~rc1+git20090403-0ubuntu3 for those 3
> packages. If you can you point me to the source repository or to a
> description of the changes made
The patch is attached to this bug, and the full package change is
It only changed the shell script which gets installed as
/usr/lib/hal/scripts/hal-system-killswitch-get-power-linux, so if you
want to hack on this, you don't even need to change packages, you can
just edit it inline.
> I could try to fix the problem and tell you what was wrong with the
> update.
Thanks for having a look!
> One final question: is there any possibility to "revert back" from an
> updated package to an earlier version?
Yes. You could e. g. downgrade hal to the jaunty final version with
Hello Gerhard,
Gerhard Radatz [2009-06-20 16:24 -0000]:
> After installing this latest patch, my WiFi STOPPED working, saying something like
> "iwlagn: rfkill switch must be turned off" in dmesg (alltough the rfkill switch definitely is ON)
You mean the switch is off, and wifi should be on? What happens if you
switch it the other way round?
> The currently installed version is 0.5.12~ rc1+git20090403 -0ubuntu1, the rc1+git20090403 -0ubuntu3 for those 3
> updated version would be 0.5.12~
> packages. If you can you point me to the source repository or to a
> description of the changes made
The patch is attached to this bug, and the full package change is
http:// launchpadlibrar ian.net/ 27776744/ hal_0.5. 12%7Erc1% 2Bgit20090403- 0ubuntu2_ 0.5.12% 7Erc1%2Bgit2009 0403-0ubuntu3. diff.gz
It only changed the shell script which gets installed as hal/scripts/ hal-system- killswitch- get-power- linux, so if you
/usr/lib/
want to hack on this, you don't even need to change packages, you can
just edit it inline.
> I could try to fix the problem and tell you what was wrong with the
> update.
Thanks for having a look!
> One final question: is there any possibility to "revert back" from an
> updated package to an earlier version?
Yes. You could e. g. downgrade hal to the jaunty final version with
sudo apt-get install hal/jaunty
The other packages like libhal* can stay updated.