Comment 23 for bug 1940996

(In reply to Vincent Lefèvre from comment #19)

> regbug.c is derived from the attachment in Bug#17356 (as said in comment 5).
> I've tested this original testcase: with glibc 2.34 on x86_64, it crashes
> (segmentation fault); with glibc 2.35 on riscv64 (host gcc92), it outputs
> "no match (incorrect)".
>
> So it seems that the fix mentioned in comment 13 fixed the crashes (which
> was the initial bug report), but not the misbehavior.

OK, so in that case how about if we update Bug#17356 by (1) saying it is no longer a duplicate of Bug#11053 (as we've fixed the latter but not the former), and (2) reopening Bug#17536? If I understand you correctly, that would match the symptoms you describe.