> One of the suggestions in the linked Gramps feature request bug is to
> refer to the person as a "spouse" rather than "wife" or "husband" if it
> is a same-sex marriage.
That's not required. It's not *wrong* to refer to a man's husband has "his spouse", but you could just say "his husband". Unless the plan is to remove the words wife/husband from the software.
> One of the suggestions in the linked Gramps feature request bug is to
> refer to the person as a "spouse" rather than "wife" or "husband" if it
> is a same-sex marriage.
That's not required. It's not *wrong* to refer to a man's husband has "his spouse", but you could just say "his husband". Unless the plan is to remove the words wife/husband from the software.