The changelog entry is a bit terse, but comment #1 gives a perfect explanation of the Breaks change and in better detail than could be done in a changelog entry.
I wondered if the debhelper-compat -> debhelper change could take more explanation, but it seems obvious enough. Is the reason for making it >= 11 rather than = 11 because we have debhelper 13 in bionic-backports?
Anyway, the packaging changes LGTM, +1.
For the SRU text, it might be helpful to express the runc rebuild in a cut-and-paste style as you did for the main test case. For the [where problems might occur], you could further point out that golang-1.13 and golang-1.16 are already co-installable without conflict on focal and impish.
Hi Lucas,
The changelog entry is a bit terse, but comment #1 gives a perfect explanation of the Breaks change and in better detail than could be done in a changelog entry.
I wondered if the debhelper-compat -> debhelper change could take more explanation, but it seems obvious enough. Is the reason for making it >= 11 rather than = 11 because we have debhelper 13 in bionic-backports?
Anyway, the packaging changes LGTM, +1.
For the SRU text, it might be helpful to express the runc rebuild in a cut-and-paste style as you did for the main test case. For the [where problems might occur], you could further point out that golang-1.13 and golang-1.16 are already co-installable without conflict on focal and impish.