The definition of "confirmed" is that "Verified by someone other than the
reporter.", hence in case of "gnome-terminal" it was wrong to remove the
"confirmed" tag, since someone other than me reported as well that the
"gnome-terminal" is affected, and hence it is totally right, that the
"gnome-terminal" is non the list named "Affects" with the status of
"Confirmed".
No one told, that "gnome-terminal" is mainly responsible for the bug, but the
title of the list is *not* "The responsible packages", *but* "Affects".
And it is "Confirmed" that "gnome-terminal" is "Affected".
Henc I ask someone else, especially who removed it, to put back the
"Confirmed" status. Since the "opinion" or "invalid" vould be missleading,
and simply the opposite of the real truth.
The definition of "confirmed" is that "Verified by someone other than the
reporter.", hence in case of "gnome-terminal" it was wrong to remove the
"confirmed" tag, since someone other than me reported as well that the
"gnome-terminal" is affected, and hence it is totally right, that the
"gnome-terminal" is non the list named "Affects" with the status of
"Confirmed".
No one told, that "gnome-terminal" is mainly responsible for the bug, but the
title of the list is *not* "The responsible packages", *but* "Affects".
And it is "Confirmed" that "gnome-terminal" is "Affected".
Henc I ask someone else, especially who removed it, to put back the
"Confirmed" status. Since the "opinion" or "invalid" vould be missleading,
and simply the opposite of the real truth.