but that's just a warning which should never be fatal. That said, bug 1871262 fails to make the distinction too.
We need another crash report, better debug symbols or retracing here. Otherwise we can just call it a duplicate of bug 1871262 which itself is a little inaccurate.
I can't tell what assertion is failing here. The last message in the log is:
meta_ window_ set_stack_ position_ no_sync: assertion 'window- >stack_ position >= 0' failed
but that's just a warning which should never be fatal. That said, bug 1871262 fails to make the distinction too.
We need another crash report, better debug symbols or retracing here. Otherwise we can just call it a duplicate of bug 1871262 which itself is a little inaccurate.