Ubuntu
gjs package

  1. Bug #1714989
  2. Comment #56

Comment 56 for bug 1714989

Revision history for this message
Marco Trevisan (Treviño) (3v1n0) wrote :

André, this is something we discussed a bit upstream (see comments starting from https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788931#c61).

So as said it would be better not to make it crash, the shell too... However it's something gjs should probably handle better, but I'm not sure how this is something that could be wanted or not upstream. I'm looking how to manage that, though.

It's even true that those extensions should not play with objects that might have been destroyed on their async functions, then they need to be fixed too.