Thanks for your report. It seems to be an offshoot from <https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/20924>.
Please note that the fonts-noto packaging happens at Debian, so Debian is a more proper place to bring up this discussion.
I see the old bug <https://bugs.debian.org/756456>. Actually, the fonts-noto package is a meta package which pulls a bunch of binaries:
$ apt depends fonts-noto fonts-noto Depends: fonts-noto-core Recommends: fonts-noto-cjk Recommends: fonts-noto-cjk-extra Recommends: fonts-noto-color-emoji Recommends: fonts-noto-extra Recommends: fonts-noto-mono Recommends: fonts-noto-ui-core Recommends: fonts-noto-ui-extra Recommends: fonts-noto-unhinted
But since your request is about splitting fonts-noto-core further, I don't think the old Debian bug applies, so you'd better submit a new one.
Thanks for your report. It seems to be an offshoot from <https:/ /discourse. ubuntu. com/t/20924>.
Please note that the fonts-noto packaging happens at Debian, so Debian is a more proper place to bring up this discussion.
I see the old bug <https:/ /bugs.debian. org/756456>. Actually, the fonts-noto package is a meta package which pulls a bunch of binaries:
$ apt depends fonts-noto cjk-extra color-emoji
fonts-noto
Depends: fonts-noto-core
Recommends: fonts-noto-cjk
Recommends: fonts-noto-
Recommends: fonts-noto-
Recommends: fonts-noto-extra
Recommends: fonts-noto-mono
Recommends: fonts-noto-ui-core
Recommends: fonts-noto-ui-extra
Recommends: fonts-noto-unhinted
But since your request is about splitting fonts-noto-core further, I don't think the old Debian bug applies, so you'd better submit a new one.