Ubuntu
firefox package

  1. Bug #52524
  2. Comment #10

Comment 10 for bug 52524

Revision history for this message
Aaron Whitehouse (aaron-whitehouse) wrote :

I am changing this back to confirmed. Others clearly have the same behaviour. I don't really think that it is suitable for a specification.

It is filed upstream, so shouldn't need work in Ubuntu, but it is a little odd to have it marked as invalid.