(In reply to comment #63) > I'd verify it for 1.9.1 except status1.9.1 wasn't set but a keyword incorrectly > used.
This was fixed and verified on 1.9.1 prior to Firefox 3.5 releasing. The keyword was not use incorrectly.
(In reply to comment #63)
> I'd verify it for 1.9.1 except status1.9.1 wasn't set but a keyword incorrectly
> used.
This was fixed and verified on 1.9.1 prior to Firefox 3.5 releasing. The keyword was not use incorrectly.