> dont we risk having different versions of speech-dispatcher between host and snap and potential weird bugs?
Since the patch would have to be backported to Jammy first so that Firefox could pick it up (I assume we wouldn't want it's snapcraft.yaml to pick up stuff from a PPA), I thought that a positive result with that proposed test case would be OK, but you do have a fair point.
> And when you say host you do refer to the one where we install the snap, not the host used for building, right?
> dont we risk having different versions of speech-dispatcher between host and snap and potential weird bugs?
Since the patch would have to be backported to Jammy first so that Firefox could pick it up (I assume we wouldn't want it's snapcraft.yaml to pick up stuff from a PPA), I thought that a positive result with that proposed test case would be OK, but you do have a fair point.
> And when you say host you do refer to the one where we install the snap, not the host used for building, right?
Yes, sorry for the lack of clarity there.