> The point with ubuntu-resticted-extras is that it pulls in a lot more
> than just the unstripped (-extra-) version of ffmpeg. But if you don't
> want to do it, I definitely respect that choice.
Can you describe a good usecase when a user would want to have
libavcodec-extra-52 but not ubuntu-restricted-extras?
Paul Gevers <email address hidden> writes:
> The point with ubuntu- resticted- extras is that it pulls in a lot more
> than just the unstripped (-extra-) version of ffmpeg. But if you don't
> want to do it, I definitely respect that choice.
Can you describe a good usecase when a user would want to have restricted- extras?
libavcodec-extra-52 but not ubuntu-
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4