> Just to check, is everyone in agreement that in order to remove libfaac,
> the ffmpeg decoder would have to be included? Otherwise I predict some
> pretty serious fallout.
I bet the answer would be "maybe as a backport". :)
As much as I hate it, it's a fact that there are 2+ licenses on
libfaac that make the software/package not distributable. It's also a
fact that end-users are now aware of the problematic license and will
either seek out a solution with nero[1] or wait for ffmpeg to roll out
a better open source alternative.
Mind you, while AAC encoding might not be available, AAC decoding
(playing aac files) will work (correct me if I'm wrong), since libfaad
is a different piece of software.
> Just to check, is everyone in agreement that in order to remove libfaac,
> the ffmpeg decoder would have to be included? Otherwise I predict some
> pretty serious fallout.
I bet the answer would be "maybe as a backport". :)
@Jim, the unaware end-users (like you and me) have been informed: www.omgubuntu. co.uk/2010/ 03/aac- codec-to- be-removed- from-ubuntu. html
http://
As much as I hate it, it's a fact that there are 2+ licenses on
libfaac that make the software/package not distributable. It's also a
fact that end-users are now aware of the problematic license and will
either seek out a solution with nero[1] or wait for ffmpeg to roll out
a better open source alternative.
Mind you, while AAC encoding might not be available, AAC decoding
(playing aac files) will work (correct me if I'm wrong), since libfaad
is a different piece of software.