Ok, thanks. I did not read all of the post, but the ones that I did
read did not seem to mention the amount of data in the mailbox. Thanks
for confirming.
Regarding the trace, are you saying that work on his issue is stopped
until someone provides a backtrace?
Thanks,
Jack
On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 06:05 +0000, Darxus wrote:
> Jack: I agree that the problem seems to correspond to the amount of
> data in a mailbox. As I posted in the comment before yours, this bug is
> waiting for a backtrace. In the short time I managed to put up with
> evolution since I posted that comment I was not able to reproduce the
> backend crash to get a trace.
>
Darxus,
Ok, thanks. I did not read all of the post, but the ones that I did
read did not seem to mention the amount of data in the mailbox. Thanks
for confirming.
Regarding the trace, are you saying that work on his issue is stopped
until someone provides a backtrace?
Thanks,
Jack
On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 06:05 +0000, Darxus wrote:
> Jack: I agree that the problem seems to correspond to the amount of
> data in a mailbox. As I posted in the comment before yours, this bug is
> waiting for a backtrace. In the short time I managed to put up with
> evolution since I posted that comment I was not able to reproduce the
> backend crash to get a trace.
>