Yeah, but the texworks editor is sooo poor when compared with my Emacs
macros built in years of use...
/PA
> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 04:33:28 +0000
> From: <email address hidden>
> To: <email address hidden>
> Subject: [Bug 666618] Re: evince doesn't include synctex support in 10.10
>
> Oh, and an advice: rather than use Okular (which I have in the past),
> try using texworks instead. It uses the same rendering engine as evince,
> and lets you easily perform reverse-search.
>
> --
> evince doesn't include synctex support in 10.10
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666618
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
Yeah, but the texworks editor is sooo poor when compared with my Emacs
macros built in years of use...
/PA
> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 04:33:28 +0000 /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 666618
> From: <email address hidden>
> To: <email address hidden>
> Subject: [Bug 666618] Re: evince doesn't include synctex support in 10.10
>
> Oh, and an advice: rather than use Okular (which I have in the past),
> try using texworks instead. It uses the same rendering engine as evince,
> and lets you easily perform reverse-search.
>
> --
> evince doesn't include synctex support in 10.10
> https:/
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.