Any time you say "the images should work around..", that means that UEC's EC2 compatibility is -broken-. UEC should return a text hostname (ip-a-b-c-d? instancename? no-dns-you-loser.euca-a-b-c-d? whatever.) in the hostname field. Regardless of configuration. The spec you are claiming compatibility with -insists- on that.
The iterator would be nice (that is what we would have used in our installation), or even a sprintf-style configurator, but that is (reasonably) a wishlist request.
"We put numbers where the spec -requires- text" IS A BUG.
Any time you say "the images should work around..", that means that UEC's EC2 compatibility is -broken-. UEC should return a text hostname (ip-a-b-c-d? instancename? no-dns- you-loser. euca-a- b-c-d? whatever.) in the hostname field. Regardless of configuration. The spec you are claiming compatibility with -insists- on that.
The iterator would be nice (that is what we would have used in our installation), or even a sprintf-style configurator, but that is (reasonably) a wishlist request.
"We put numbers where the spec -requires- text" IS A BUG.