(In reply to Siddhesh Poyarekar from comment #10)
> It should finish a few minutes before forever :)
>
> The *_nocache code is O(n^3) (IIRC), so it's very very slow.
Hi. Thanks for your quick reply. With that kind of complexity I'll adopt your heuristic: if no failure in 5 minutes, assume success.
> If you want to do a correctness test then I'd suggest commenting out the
> get_next_seq_cached paths so that get_next_seq_nocache is called all the
> time and then run your usual strcoll correctness tests.
Thanks for the suggestion, I'll force get_next_seq_nocache and run my strcoll faithfulness tests.
(In reply to Siddhesh Poyarekar from comment #10)
> It should finish a few minutes before forever :)
>
> The *_nocache code is O(n^3) (IIRC), so it's very very slow.
Hi. Thanks for your quick reply. With that kind of complexity I'll adopt your heuristic: if no failure in 5 minutes, assume success.
> If you want to do a correctness test then I'd suggest commenting out the seq_nocache is called all the
> get_next_seq_cached paths so that get_next_
> time and then run your usual strcoll correctness tests.
Thanks for the suggestion, I'll force get_next_ seq_nocache and run my strcoll faithfulness tests.