Comment 2 for bug 800647

Thanks, Colin.

I don't remember doing this packaging myself, and I can't say that I've ever used the python bindings either. I believe that these are vestigial remnants of some key escrow service work Michael Halcrow had started.

python-libecryptfs is perfectly fine by me. We can drop the "-utils" from the path, so just ecryptfs/libecryptfs.

I don't know of a single person using this module. I don't think a transition is required.

If you could propose a merge to lp:ecryptfs, that would be ideal. Thanks.