Wolf, dnsmasq is not going to be taken out of the distribution. Probably you meant that NM-driven dnsmasq shouldn't be enabled by default. If so then please file another report against network-manager with the title "Please don't enable dnsmasq by default so long as it's so buggy." But that measure will do nothing to address the issue in this report (#998712) which is the fact that domain name completion gets broken under certain circumstances when dnsmasq *is* used.
To remind you, we are still in the phase where we are trying to figure out exactly what those circumstances are. I believe you when you say that the failure occurs. But usually name service doesn't fail; so what is the trigger?
Finding some reproducible circumstances that trigger the malfunction is a precondition for preparing "test equipment". Characterizing those circumstances is also useful for isolating the bug.
In addressing this issue I know you'd like to be helpful, but for various reasons you can't be helpful. You can't provide the information I asked for in #17, for example, for security reasons, and because you are too busy, and so on. I understand.
Wolf, dnsmasq is not going to be taken out of the distribution. Probably you meant that NM-driven dnsmasq shouldn't be enabled by default. If so then please file another report against network-manager with the title "Please don't enable dnsmasq by default so long as it's so buggy." But that measure will do nothing to address the issue in this report (#998712) which is the fact that domain name completion gets broken under certain circumstances when dnsmasq *is* used.
To remind you, we are still in the phase where we are trying to figure out exactly what those circumstances are. I believe you when you say that the failure occurs. But usually name service doesn't fail; so what is the trigger?
Finding some reproducible circumstances that trigger the malfunction is a precondition for preparing "test equipment". Characterizing those circumstances is also useful for isolating the bug.
In addressing this issue I know you'd like to be helpful, but for various reasons you can't be helpful. You can't provide the information I asked for in #17, for example, for security reasons, and because you are too busy, and so on. I understand.