On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Tomasz Chrzczonowicz
<email address hidden> wrote:
> @Travis: So what can be done about it? Should we report bugs against
> every application that does this? Or is this GNOME system-wide policy?
>
The options are:
1) Wait for the new spread stuff to land where we'll use bamf for hi-res icons
2) Make window->getIcon wrappable, create a plugin to use bamf to get
the hi-res icon
3) Ask GNOME nicely to make their _NET_WM_ICON a bit bigger :)
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Tomasz Chrzczonowicz
<email address hidden> wrote:
> @Travis: So what can be done about it? Should we report bugs against
> every application that does this? Or is this GNOME system-wide policy?
>
The options are:
1) Wait for the new spread stuff to land where we'll use bamf for hi-res icons
2) Make window->getIcon wrappable, create a plugin to use bamf to get
the hi-res icon
3) Ask GNOME nicely to make their _NET_WM_ICON a bit bigger :)
> -- /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 598861 _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _____ /launchpad. net/~compiz /launchpad. net/~compiz /help.launchpad .net/ListHelp
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz
> packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu.
> https:/
>
> Title:
> Compiz application switcher uses blurry, pixelated icons
>
> _______
> Mailing list: https:/
> Post to : <email address hidden>
> Unsubscribe : https:/
> More help : https:/
>
--
Sam Spilsbury