I have another update that will flip things over with regards to the SRU (again).
I performed validation for jammy-yoga following the update SRU template, therefore applying the config option change after upgrading the package with the original failed fix, following my previous understanding from reading the code that the original failed fix enabled this config option workaround. This worked fine.
However, I proceeded to validate jammy-zed, but I decided to apply the config option change before the upgrade package and retry the image-create command, just to test. To my surprise, it worked. I performed lots of testing following this and concluded that the config option would have worked from the start and not need the original fix in the first place.
Therefore, I am once again aborting this SRU because the original failed fix as it is it is not adding anything useful, and the workaround works without it.
Talking to Brian Rosmaita a few minutes ago and sharing the new findings we agreed that the new fix is still very desirable so to "do things correctly" and avoid having to do this config option workaround approach that is not ideal.
For SRU purposes, the new fix will eventually be included in a point release SRU and no longer need a specific SRU for this. So, again, aborting this SRU.
I have another update that will flip things over with regards to the SRU (again).
I performed validation for jammy-yoga following the update SRU template, therefore applying the config option change after upgrading the package with the original failed fix, following my previous understanding from reading the code that the original failed fix enabled this config option workaround. This worked fine.
However, I proceeded to validate jammy-zed, but I decided to apply the config option change before the upgrade package and retry the image-create command, just to test. To my surprise, it worked. I performed lots of testing following this and concluded that the config option would have worked from the start and not need the original fix in the first place.
Therefore, I am once again aborting this SRU because the original failed fix as it is it is not adding anything useful, and the workaround works without it.
Talking to Brian Rosmaita a few minutes ago and sharing the new findings we agreed that the new fix is still very desirable so to "do things correctly" and avoid having to do this config option workaround approach that is not ideal.
For SRU purposes, the new fix will eventually be included in a point release SRU and no longer need a specific SRU for this. So, again, aborting this SRU.