Dave Mielke, le Wed 09 Nov 2011 10:06:24 -0500, a écrit :
> [quoted lines by Samuel Thibault on 2011/11/09 at 15:14 +0100]
>
> >Err, precedence, really? Won't that let brltty still start?
>
> Sure. It'd only be a problem for that one particular model of braille device.
> In that particular case, users could still manually start brltty, in which case
> it'd still claim the device.
Err, there must be a misunderstanding.
I was suggesting that the solution you propose will actually *not*
prevent brltty from starting, since the brltty udev rules will still set
RUN, and I don't think the generic rule for serial ports will clear it.
Dave Mielke, le Wed 09 Nov 2011 10:06:24 -0500, a écrit :
> [quoted lines by Samuel Thibault on 2011/11/09 at 15:14 +0100]
>
> >Err, precedence, really? Won't that let brltty still start?
>
> Sure. It'd only be a problem for that one particular model of braille device.
> In that particular case, users could still manually start brltty, in which case
> it'd still claim the device.
Err, there must be a misunderstanding.
I was suggesting that the solution you propose will actually *not*
prevent brltty from starting, since the brltty udev rules will still set
RUN, and I don't think the generic rule for serial ports will clear it.
Samuel