> 1) Why is this configuration option not default upstream?
For their stable release policy. This doesn't apply to a new Ubuntu release.
> 2) Debian doesn't carry this flag.
It will.
> 3) Any security implications that I've not thought of?
Marc has acked the configuration switch, but not enabling rate limiting in the default config, which I think is fine and is what is being asked for here.
> 4) We're past feature freeze for Trusty.
LaMont says that we've carried a patch for this feature before, so if support is gone, this is actually a regression. Thus I think it's a bugfix, not a feature, and so the freeze doesn't apply.
Following discussion on IRC:
> 1) Why is this configuration option not default upstream?
For their stable release policy. This doesn't apply to a new Ubuntu release.
> 2) Debian doesn't carry this flag.
It will.
> 3) Any security implications that I've not thought of?
Marc has acked the configuration switch, but not enabling rate limiting in the default config, which I think is fine and is what is being asked for here.
> 4) We're past feature freeze for Trusty.
LaMont says that we've carried a patch for this feature before, so if support is gone, this is actually a regression. Thus I think it's a bugfix, not a feature, and so the freeze doesn't apply.
LaMont said he'd look at this on Sunday for us (thanks!). IRC log will appear here, though it's not updated yet: http:// irclogs. ubuntu. com/2014/ 03/07/% 23ubuntu- server. html