Log in / Register
Ubuntu
apparmor package
Overview
Code
Bugs
Blueprints
Translations
Answers
Bug #1305108
Comment #19
Comment 19 for bug 1305108
Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur)
wrote
on 2014-06-12
:
#19
@Steve:
wouldn't "started apparmor" be racy?
should we emit an "apparmor-loaded" event or something?
@Steve: wouldn't "started apparmor" be racy? should we emit an "apparmor-loaded" event or something?
@Steve:
wouldn't "started apparmor" be racy?
should we emit an "apparmor-loaded" event or something?