So, it's April 2008 and Hardy is in a hurry to ship.
In my plain ole default installation of Hardy:
- Tomboy crashes on system start (my bugreport was marked "invalid" wheeee!)
- F-Spot doesn't even start
- alacarte crashes arbitrarily when I do whatever in it, like moving menu items up or down or ticking some menu item
("alacarte crashed with AttributeError in __getPath()") and doesn't seem to be a bug either
And that's the default installation. So if all the bugs posted by the users are being marked invalid and such, then Hardy will be able to ship without bugs, which is something Ubuntu can be truly fond of, and users won't need to report bugs, which is good now I think about it. Is this too sarkastic or does it actually represent current practice wrt bugreports?
Same problem here.
So, it's April 2008 and Hardy is in a hurry to ship.
In my plain ole default installation of Hardy:
- Tomboy crashes on system start (my bugreport was marked "invalid" wheeee!)
- F-Spot doesn't even start
- alacarte crashes arbitrarily when I do whatever in it, like moving menu items up or down or ticking some menu item
("alacarte crashed with AttributeError in __getPath()") and doesn't seem to be a bug either
And that's the default installation. So if all the bugs posted by the users are being marked invalid and such, then Hardy will be able to ship without bugs, which is something Ubuntu can be truly fond of, and users won't need to report bugs, which is good now I think about it. Is this too sarkastic or does it actually represent current practice wrt bugreports?