[needs-packaging] Enhancement Request - Citrix Receiver as Ubuntu Partner package

Bug #524851 reported by Alex Cockell
20
This bug affects 4 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Ubuntu
Confirmed
Wishlist
Unassigned

Bug Description

I think this has been raised before, both in Brainstorm and on the back of old bugs... and as community documentation. However, it has also been raised in Citrix's own discussion areas...

Namely, getting Citrix Receiver available for Ubuntu from the repositories.

Would it be possible for more experienced personnel to look into the possibility of Canonical liaising with Citrix so that the Receiver client could be made available as a fully-supported app in the Partner repository? That way, bugfixes could be easily and quickly supplied in the future... and all the dependencies can be handled quickly and easily? And most of all - safely?

IT would help with possible business deployments of Ubuntu. But more prosaically - apparently Citrix have been having issues with building Debian packages - but they supply tarballs and RPMs. Maybe Canonical can help them in this regard?

Speaking from a personal front, I use Citrix Receiver when I work from home - and keeping up to date with bugfixes would be a lot easier if I could just let Update Manager handle that for me.

Current Citrix install process - https://help.ubuntu.com/community/CitrixICAClientHowTo
Ubuntuforums thread (I do not have access from work)

Current bug - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/295083
This was declined for Jaunty - could we get it in for Lucid? Would help with business adoption...

Citrix discussion about *them* wanting it an "sudo apt-get install" away - http://community.citrix.com/display/ocb/2008/05/30/List+ICA+client+in+Ubuntu+Application+Repository

Citrix knowledgebase article for debian - http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX118108,

Could this be looked into, please?

Alex Cockell (alcockell)
tags: added: needs-packaging
Omer Akram (om26er)
Changed in ubuntu:
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
Revision history for this message
Anthony Ruiz (tony-2rustic) wrote :

A win-win for Citrix and Ubuntu/Canonical if a partnership is made. Virtual Desktop infrastructures have opened a niche in the enterprise for Ubuntu as a low cost desktop appliance. It will pave the way for introducing a local Linux desktop, while still supporting the existing Microsoft infrastructure. Ubuntu and Citrix is a perfect desktop solution for Task Workers who only require a simple desktop to access their already thin applications (web, java, Citrix) to avoid the cost of a VDI solution.

Revision history for this message
Alex Cockell (alcockell) wrote :

I noticed a development on the Citrix website...

It appears that Citrix clients are now available as a .deb off their website...
http://www.citrix.com/English/ss/downloads/details.asp?downloadId=3323&productId=186&c1=sot2755&c2=ost1349860

Documentation is available here...
http://support.citrix.com/proddocs/index.jsp?topic=/receiver-linux-blackfoot/linux-readme-11-100.html

Would it be possible for this bug to be escalated with Canonical, and they get around a table with Citrix - get it into the Partner repo.. in time for 10.04.1 respin and also backport for Karmic and Hardy? Obviously check dependencies...

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

Changed in ubuntu:
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
MichaelE (michael-eitelwein) wrote :

This would clearly be helpful. Many large corporations currently develop citrix based virtual client environments (like the one I am working for).

Revision history for this message
MichaelE (michael-eitelwein) wrote :

This would still be helpful. Citrix is releasing decent packages for Debian/ubuntu by now - can these be integrated?

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.