Thanks for this bug report, it does look like liburing would be worthy of packaging and inclusion in debian and ubuntu, although I don't think it's correct to have this filed against libaio. Instead I'm tagging it as 'needs packaging', per the New Package Policy, which covers this situation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages
It sounds like a 0.2 release of liburing is pending, and since FF for eoan has already closed, maybe worth waiting until 0.2 is out:
https://<email address hidden>/msg39689.html
Fwiw, there is a RPM package of 0.1 (https://pkgs.org/download/liburing), and from its .spec file the packaging looks super straightforward. Hopefully someone will grab it from the needs-packaging queue soon. Or, if you'd be interested in taking a first crack at the deb packaging, that would certainly be a great way to get this moved forward.
Thanks for this bug report, it does look like liburing would be worthy of packaging and inclusion in debian and ubuntu, although I don't think it's correct to have this filed against libaio. Instead I'm tagging it as 'needs packaging', per the New Package Policy, which covers this situation: https:/ /wiki.ubuntu. com/UbuntuDevel opment/ NewPackages
It sounds like a 0.2 release of liburing is pending, and since FF for eoan has already closed, maybe worth waiting until 0.2 is out: /msg39689. html
https://<email address hidden>
Fwiw, there is a RPM package of 0.1 (https:/ /pkgs.org/ download/ liburing), and from its .spec file the packaging looks super straightforward. Hopefully someone will grab it from the needs-packaging queue soon. Or, if you'd be interested in taking a first crack at the deb packaging, that would certainly be a great way to get this moved forward.