>You know there has been an RFP on cinelerra itself for a very
>long time, almost 5 years. See bugs.debian.org/78209, 156614,
>239570.
>
>Why do you want to have a CVS version from the package if there
>even isn't a normal version of it in the archive?
>
>
cinelerra is forked. To repeat what Riccardo has written:
"This is a branched version of Cinelerra sometimes called
Cinelerra-CVS
.
Please visit cvs.cinelerra.org for more information regarding
this duality."
But your reaction proves that the name "cinelerra-cvs" is misleading.
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>You know there has been an RFP on cinelerra itself for a very org/78209, 156614,
>long time, almost 5 years. See bugs.debian.
>239570.
>
>Why do you want to have a CVS version from the package if there
>even isn't a normal version of it in the archive?
>
>
cinelerra is forked. To repeat what Riccardo has written:
"This is a branched version of Cinelerra sometimes called
Cinelerra-CVS
.
Please visit cvs.cinelerra.org for more information regarding
this duality."
But your reaction proves that the name "cinelerra-cvs" is misleading.
Cheers,
Andreas