On 2016-04-30 06:40, Cheng-Chia Tseng wrote:
> Using subset OTFs is suggested for OS exept MacOS and Windows by the
> README file from Source Han Sans (same as Noto Sans CJK).
According to the README.formats file, which is included in the fonts-noto-cjk source package, OTC "works" on recent versions of Mac and Linux but not Windows. So they don't seem to be identical.
> However, as I stated previously, I believe using Super OTC is a way
> to find where the apps in Linux world which has some problems dealing
> with this "super font," and that helps shape a better Linux world in
> the future. People find the problem, report the problem, and the
> problem be fixed one day.
Hmm.. I see now that you anticipated problems with "Super OTC" [1] long ago. At that time I hadn't a clue what you were talking about. :(
What you say is correct, but we shouldn't use the whole community of Ubuntu users as a test panel, should we?
> To be the first to find the problems and work with upstreams to fix
> them? Or just do as the official recommendation to get the better
> result and serve users better first?
On 2016-04-30 06:40, Cheng-Chia Tseng wrote:
> Using subset OTFs is suggested for OS exept MacOS and Windows by the
> README file from Source Han Sans (same as Noto Sans CJK).
According to the README.formats file, which is included in the fonts-noto-cjk source package, OTC "works" on recent versions of Mac and Linux but not Windows. So they don't seem to be identical.
> However, as I stated previously, I believe using Super OTC is a way
> to find where the apps in Linux world which has some problems dealing
> with this "super font," and that helps shape a better Linux world in
> the future. People find the problem, report the problem, and the
> problem be fixed one day.
Hmm.. I see now that you anticipated problems with "Super OTC" [1] long ago. At that time I hadn't a clue what you were talking about. :(
What you say is correct, but we shouldn't use the whole community of Ubuntu users as a test panel, should we?
> To be the first to find the problems and work with upstreams to fix
> them? Or just do as the official recommendation to get the better
> result and serve users better first?
Why not do both? I filed this ticket: /github. com/googlei18n/ noto-cjk/ issues/ 65
https:/
Hopefully it's the right place.
Can you possibly confirm that the PPA version of fonts-noto-cjk addresses the issues we have found up to now (at the expense of more disk space)?
[1] Super OTC is the font format installed with the version of
fonts-noto-cjk which is currently in the Ubuntu archive.