Using subset OTFs is suggested for OS exept MacOS and Windows by the README file from Source Han Sans (same as Noto Sans CJK).
However, as I stated previously, I believe using Super OTC is a way to find where the apps in Linux world which has some problems dealing with this "super font," and that helps shape a better Linux world in the future. People find the problem, report the problem, and the problem be fixed one day.
Both ways are fine though. The system still has some places to be improved to support Super OTC better while Subset OTFs require more space and more packages. To be the first to find the problems and work with upstreams to fix them? Or just do as the official recommendation to get the better result and serve users better first?
Using subset OTFs is suggested for OS exept MacOS and Windows by the README file from Source Han Sans (same as Noto Sans CJK).
However, as I stated previously, I believe using Super OTC is a way to find where the apps in Linux world which has some problems dealing with this "super font," and that helps shape a better Linux world in the future. People find the problem, report the problem, and the problem be fixed one day.
Both ways are fine though. The system still has some places to be improved to support Super OTC better while Subset OTFs require more space and more packages. To be the first to find the problems and work with upstreams to fix them? Or just do as the official recommendation to get the better result and serve users better first?
Any thoughts on this?