Can you add some details regarding what image channel you actually used and device for testing? rc-proposed is probably the best base for you to use.
The "GetAll" behavior you're describing is similar to what I was seeing with the AccessPoint objects. The code would see a "PropertiesChanged" signal for an access point, and directly issue a blocking "GetAll" call. This should only be done at initial object creation. Once initialized, the properties can be monitored directly via "PropertiesChanged" signals and the included payload. I imagine this is probably what you've done with your patch.
I'll review your updates, and confer with some others to see if we defer your additional changes to OTA9, or try to get them in as part of a proposed hot-fix.
@Lorn
Can you add some details regarding what image channel you actually used and device for testing? rc-proposed is probably the best base for you to use.
The "GetAll" behavior you're describing is similar to what I was seeing with the AccessPoint objects. The code would see a "PropertiesChanged" signal for an access point, and directly issue a blocking "GetAll" call. This should only be done at initial object creation. Once initialized, the properties can be monitored directly via "PropertiesChanged" signals and the included payload. I imagine this is probably what you've done with your patch.
I'll review your updates, and confer with some others to see if we defer your additional changes to OTA9, or try to get them in as part of a proposed hot-fix.
Thanks again for your help!