Apparently, somebody has created a build ...318.19 in the tracker, but this version doesn't exist in archive.ubuntu.com. However, build ...318 does [1].
Is there a technical/social reason why the build couldn't be 318 in the tracker? (I understand that it allows separation of bugs/results to different builds, but if that's desirable, isn't it weird that the download location for the different builds is the same?)
If there is a reason/need to separate the subversion builds, could
1) the VERSION placeholder potentially dismiss some part of the tracker "build", eg. a hashtag
2) the archive server also separate these builds
Apparently, somebody has created a build ...318.19 in the tracker, but this version doesn't exist in archive.ubuntu.com. However, build ...318 does [1].
Is there a technical/social reason why the build couldn't be 318 in the tracker? (I understand that it allows separation of bugs/results to different builds, but if that's desirable, isn't it weird that the download location for the different builds is the same?)
If there is a reason/need to separate the subversion builds, could
1) the VERSION placeholder potentially dismiss some part of the tracker "build", eg. a hashtag
2) the archive server also separate these builds
[1] http:// archive. ubuntu. com/ubuntu/ dists/trusty/ main/installer- amd64/20101020u buntu318/ images/ netboot/