> While font.ubuntu.com/about says this: you are expressly encouraged to experiment, modify, share and improve, why does ubuntu (canonical) don't license the font that are really safe for users (like GNU GPL + font exception).
I don't think that GPL+FE is a safer license; it is treated as a new license by many legal teams, and would contribute to the license proliferation problem.
The OFL is recognised as a free license by the FSF and is widely accepted by many legal teams.
> While font.ubuntu. com/about says this: you are expressly encouraged to experiment, modify, share and improve, why does ubuntu (canonical) don't license the font that are really safe for users (like GNU GPL + font exception).
I don't think that GPL+FE is a safer license; it is treated as a new license by many legal teams, and would contribute to the license proliferation problem.
The OFL is recognised as a free license by the FSF and is widely accepted by many legal teams.