That fix was: > * Hopefully fix LP: #1711337 by building the armhf build with > -fno-schedule-insns to work around a compiler bug ?
According to https://launchpadlibrarian.net/351233449/buildlog_ubuntu-xenial-armhf.firefox_57.0.3+build1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1_BUILDING.txt.gz it's building with: > --enable-optimize=-g -O2 -fno-schedule-insns
So it looks like the fix was indeed ported, but given the word "hopefully", but was it ever confirmed?
Just like Adam Smith with version 55, arm64 appears to be fine. And just like herrtimson with version 55, even armv7 works on Arch Linux but still crashes on Debian/Ubuntu: https://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=63&t=150438&start=50
That fix was:
> * Hopefully fix LP: #1711337 by building the armhf build with
> -fno-schedule-insns to work around a compiler bug
?
According to https:/ /launchpadlibra rian.net/ 351233449/ buildlog_ ubuntu- xenial- armhf.firefox_ 57.0.3+ build1- 0ubuntu0. 16.04.1_ BUILDING. txt.gz it's building with: optimize= -g -O2 -fno-schedule-insns
> --enable-
So it looks like the fix was indeed ported, but given the word "hopefully", but was it ever confirmed?
Just like Adam Smith with version 55, arm64 appears to be fine. And just like herrtimson with version 55, even armv7 works on Arch Linux but still crashes on Debian/Ubuntu: https:/ /www.raspberryp i.org/forums/ viewtopic. php?f=63& t=150438& start=50