So..... I still get this bug... In 9.10 and 10.04 (also with soft mount).
Should I open this bug or create a new one, as I get the idea people here keep closing it (could be wrong).
I have been chatting with the nfs folks for a while: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.nfs/30482
We did not solve this bugger yet, I somewhat get the idea that this is not caused by either nautilus or nfs (as it is stateless).
Anyhow, current state is that the performance/health of client machines are totally dependent of a single server machine (even if the server is serving non-trivial files to a non-trivial client-directory).
So..... I still get this bug... In 9.10 and 10.04 (also with soft mount).
Should I open this bug or create a new one, as I get the idea people here keep closing it (could be wrong).
I have been chatting with the nfs folks for a while: thread. gmane.org/ gmane.linux. nfs/30482
http://
We did not solve this bugger yet, I somewhat get the idea that this is not caused by either nautilus or nfs (as it is stateless).
Anyhow, current state is that the performance/health of client machines are totally dependent of a single server machine (even if the server is serving non-trivial files to a non-trivial client-directory).