On 10/12/2011 9:56 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
> You need to multiply_scenarios before nose sees the tests, because
> nose makes untrue assumptions about the unittest protocol.
>
> ** Changed in: testscenarios Status: New => Invalid
>
So I think it is still true that TestWithScenarios is incompatible
with nosetests. Perhaps wontfix is more accurate than invalid.
I also couldn't find a good way to easily do generate_scenarios ahead
of time, because nosetests was treating "load_tests" as another test
to be run, rather than as a test suite loading function (on python 2.6).
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10/12/2011 9:56 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
> You need to multiply_scenarios before nose sees the tests, because
> nose makes untrue assumptions about the unittest protocol.
>
> ** Changed in: testscenarios Status: New => Invalid
>
So I think it is still true that TestWithScenarios is incompatible
with nosetests. Perhaps wontfix is more accurate than invalid.
I also couldn't find a good way to easily do generate_scenarios ahead
of time, because nosetests was treating "load_tests" as another test
to be run, rather than as a test suite loading function (on python 2.6).
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- enigmail. mozdev. org/
X9+QACgkQJdeBCY SNAAMPlACcDoka+ mD+HYqMMzeO6REU X7hK tsMnrBh39J70otq Hy
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iEYEARECAAYFAk6
z/0AoMUAbnDtoVa
=NaQP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----