Will do. at one point I meticulously checked all the processes reported by
snap as blocking,; they had all exited but still the update did not trigger.
For debugging, it is ok for me to do a snap revert to go back to a prior
version in order to simulate a pending update?
On Thu, 18 May 2023, 20:21 Miguel Pires, <email address hidden> wrote:
Will do. at one point I meticulously checked all the processes reported by
snap as blocking,; they had all exited but still the update did not trigger.
For debugging, it is ok for me to do a snap revert to go back to a prior
version in order to simulate a pending update?
On Thu, 18 May 2023, 20:21 Miguel Pires, <email address hidden> wrote:
> Hi. I think this is happening because firefox leaves processes hanging /forum. snapcraft. io/t/close- the-app- to-avoid- for-a-closed- app/34291/ 5?u=miguelpires /forum. snapcraft. io/t/close- the-app- to-avoid- disruptions- for-a-closed- app/34291/ 5?u=miguelpires>). /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 2019158 /bugs.launchpad .net/snapd/ +bug/2019158/ +subscriptions
> in its cgroup scope which means snapd can't detect it has closed and
> refresh it (see: https:/
> disruptions-
> <https:/
> If this happens
> again, you can check if that's the case by running `systemctl status`
> and checking if there's still a cgroup scope for the snap.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https:/
>
> Title:
> snap 2.59.2 is not doing updates automatically
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https:/
>
>