On 29 June 2011 09:59, Alexander Belchenko <email address hidden> wrote:
> Based on traceback I see we're trying to get the file from workig tree.
> Apparetly deleted file is not here.
>
Yes it has been deleted a number of revisions back.
> Could you say, please, have your tree had uncommitted changes?
>
Yes, I wanted to check something before committing, but I don't think that
makes a difference:
I could reproduce it now with the qbzr tree (with no uncommitted stuff) with
the steps in the original bug.
On 29 June 2011 09:59, Alexander Belchenko <email address hidden> wrote:
> Based on traceback I see we're trying to get the file from workig tree.
> Apparetly deleted file is not here.
>
Yes it has been deleted a number of revisions back.
> Could you say, please, have your tree had uncommitted changes?
>
Yes, I wanted to check something before committing, but I don't think that
makes a difference:
I could reproduce it now with the qbzr tree (with no uncommitted stuff) with
the steps in the original bug.