Comment 1 for bug 1521361

Revision history for this message
Tim Burke (1-tim-z) wrote :

How should this handle older clusters? I could see three reasonable responses, though I don't like any of them:

 * Reverse listing client-side (memory-intensive)
 * Error out (not terribly user-friendly)
 * Ignore the reverse arg (probably while raising a warning; still not user-friendly)