Comment 17 for bug 1705755

RE comment #16 and the neutron drivers meeting.

- I don't feel the issue herein was fully understood in that discussion. What we are talking about herein is related to the CLI and the fact that we have no way to add support for resource attribute extensions to the OSC. I'm not really understand why the discussion in the drivers meeting is talking about API definitions in neutron-lib; how does that help the CLI issue herein?
- W/R/T to support the extra args; we've had this for years. We can't just up and drop support for it.
- Going back to comment #14... If the long term direction is to transition away from API extensions in neutron, then as a result I suspect the issue herein will go away; since there won't be extensions (the root of this issue IMO). That said, I think we need to understand when that will happen and if we can keep the neutronclient until that time. Otherwise we have to invest in getting OSC to work with these extensions (the issue herein) and that work will get "thrown away (per say)" when we unify the API.

That said, I will try to follow up with the drivers team to re-tee this topic; again I'm not sure the full context was understood in that meeting. Nor do I think the full impact of removing the extra args is understood.